Some matters in need of discussing[]
I am terribly busy and frustrated now, so I'll make it short:
Did you notice that there's a JA version of this wiki now?! Isn't that amazing?!
FarelTheGecko (talk) 18:33, November 9, 2012 (UTC)
Indeed, it is.Consus, the Erudite God (talk) 04:44, November 23, 2012 (UTC)
So where is this wiki again? I would love to crib some of the formatting.? Elliott20 (talk) 02:45, November 26, 2012 (UTC)
Just here:
http://ja.saga.wikia.com/wiki/SaGa_Wiki
FarelTheGecko (talk) 11:12, November 26, 2012 (UTC)
Wow, that's some pretty good info they got there.
Elliott20 (talk) 15:34, December 5, 2012 (UTC)
You know Japanese? You can tell what it means?
FarelTheGecko (talk) 17:44, December 7, 2012 (UTC)
Oh and yeah... another thing[]
I know this will again sound odd, but some time has passed and I figured that my decicion to have Romancing SaGa Minstrel Song be a seperate game from Romancing Saga on the SNES might have been wrong, cause then... shouldn't each remake/port of the game have its own page? And heck, the SNES version barely has a thing in it. It just concerns me, but I'm not even sure what we should do to fix this... and should we even? JUST WONDERING!
FarelTheGecko (talk) 07:27, November 25, 2012 (UTC)
Do what you wish with it, as long as the result looks neat.Consus, the Erudite God (talk) 13:54, November 25, 2012 (UTC)
I actually think it will depend upon if you prioritize what makes the games different or what makes them the same. i.e. the games do share the same narrative at a high level. So if you prioritize that over other elements, then keeping the two games together in one place makes sense, with extra pages that talk about how each game's systems and elaborate on the differences.
However, the games themselves are fundamentally different experiences and as such if we're more concerned about what the players experience, we should keep them separated. Elliott20 (talk) 02:48, November 26, 2012 (UTC)
Allright fair enough then :)
FarelTheGecko (talk) 11:12, November 26, 2012 (UTC)